Skip to main content

View and Submit Petitions

  • Details
  • Signatures
  • Response to Petition
Reconsider Ely's 20mph Zone

We, the undersigned, support 20mph speed limits in places such as outside Schools and in high pedestrian areas, where the evidence shows it is needed and will improve road safety.

We do not support the use of blanket 20mph zones like that imposed in Ely in March 2024, where the consultation was poorly executed, and where thousands of people that stood to be affected were unaware of the proposal and wide community support was not demonstrated. 

We believe that the decision to implement the Ely 20mph zone being taken by a single Officer of Cambridgeshire County Council in a "delegated decision meeting" in consultation with the two County Councillors for Ely was wrong.  We believe that such a decision should be taken by elected politicians in an open and transparent manner in a meeting that is open to the public to attend.

We call on Cambridgeshire County Council to reconsider the locations for 20mph speed limits in Ely, taking into account new Government guidance, and to properly evidence its proposals.  This should also take into consideration whether and what type of on road engineering solutions are required in locations proposed for 20mph speed limits in order to secure maximum possible compliance. 

Following this, we call on Cambridgeshire County Council to carry out a new comprehensive and well publicised consultation on the proposals in accordance with Government guidance.

Not Specified
Tuesday, 30 April 2024
Monday, 23 September 2024
Anna Bailey
This petition currently has 2724 signatures in total.
Petition Signatories
2724 electronic signatures
 Page 1 of 273, items 1 to 10 of 2724.
Porter A
Alice A
james a hill
Catherine Adams
Christine Adams
Jane Adkins
Tom Adomeit
Robyn Afford
Keith Aggett
Arif Ahmed
This petition has been reviewed and the following response has been offered:

The 20mph Scheme in Ely has been installed in an urban residential city environment, and a large proportion of the roads which are now 20mph are estate type, unclassified routes in low-speed, traffic calmed areas. Other areas along the more major routes within the city, such as Lynn Road or Downham Road, have been significantly pedestrianised with shared use cycle routes, signalised crossings, zebra crossings, traffic calming, a significant number of junctions and / or flashing signs. In other areas of the city, there are also substantial amounts of on-street parking. These factors all contribute to slower vehicle speeds, and the roads included within the Ely 20mph zone are popular walking, cycling and wheeling routes in and around the city.

 There are also schools, care homes, GP surgeries, places of worship and other community amenities (trip attractors), which are located along these routes and others like them, and which, (often vulnerable) people need to visit daily. Lower speeds will lead to people feeling safer and more confident to walk or cycle for these local trips instead of using their vehicles, which will deliver health, community and environmental benefits by reducing vehicle emissions within the city.

 The Constitution and Ethics Committee, at its meeting on 3 March 2015, agreed that the Constitution should be revised so that TRO objections are delegated to the Head of Local Infrastructure and Street Management (LISM), in consultation with the local member, to determine. Therefore, the Ely proposals were determined under this delegation, in consultation with the local County Councillors for Ely, consistent with the Council’s constitution. In the case of the Ely order, the officer who took the decision was the Acting Service Director for Highways and Transport Strategy, and under the Place and Sustainability directorate’s scheme of authorisation, determining objections is authorised by this officer (https://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/council/meetings-and-decisions/how-decisions-are-made).

I can confirm that the correct process as laid out in our constitution has been followed and the scheme has now been implemented. Therefore, it would not be appropriate to rerun the consultation at this point. The Highways and Transport Committee agreed on 23rd July 2024 to bring a report back to the Committee in 24 months, reviewing the impacts of the 20mph programme, and this will include Ely.

DateUserDescriptionStatus
 Page 1 of 274, items 1 to 10 of 2734.
11/10/2024 09:37 Sophie Rankine Response PublishedResponse Published
11/10/2024 09:31 Sophie Rankine Response ApprovedResponse Published
10/10/2024 16:09 Nick Mills  Response Awaiting Approval
24/09/2024 00:17(System Event)Petition Closed (responder emailed requesting response)Response Pending
23/09/2024 21:37Unregistered UserPetition Signed: Peter LancasterPetition Active
16/09/2024 22:26Unregistered UserPetition Signed: Jo SturgeonPetition Active
16/09/2024 10:11Unregistered UserPetition Signed: Alan RichardsonPetition Active
16/09/2024 10:10Unregistered UserPetition Signed: Lynne RichardsonPetition Active
13/09/2024 12:01Unregistered UserPetition Signed: Daniel CrockerPetition Active
10/09/2024 11:01Unregistered UserPetition Signed: Borisas BursteinasPetition Active

Search Petitions